Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Last updated: 09 October 2026 · Written and reviewed by CA Meet Dhrangadhariya, CSM & Co LLP
Quick summary
Internal auditing has always been about one question: are the company’s controls working, and are the risks that matter being managed? What has changed is the volume of data an auditor must look at. A mid sized company can post lakhs of entries in a year, and testing a sample of 25 or 60 of them leaves most of the population unexamined.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) helps close that gap. Tools can read documents, match transactions, score risk and flag anomalies across the whole population. This article explains where AI genuinely helps in an internal audit, where it does not, the risks to control, and a practical way to start.
Much of audit time goes into collecting and tidying data. AI can:
Illustrative example: A manufacturing company has 18,000 bank lines a month. A matching tool pairs most of them automatically and leaves a short list of unmatched or part matched items. The auditor spends time on the exceptions, such as a payment that cleared twice, instead of ticking the matches.
Instead of a small random sample, analytics can test every entry against a rule or look for entries that behave differently from the rest. Typical tests:
Illustrative example: A finance company ranks its loan accounts by early warning signals such as delayed instalments and frequent restructuring requests. The audit team then picks the highest ranked branches for field work instead of choosing by rotation.
Fraud rarely announces itself; it shows up as small oddities repeated many times. AI can help to:
Illustrative example: A retail chain’s refund data shows one store with far more refunds than stores of similar size, mostly at closing time and mostly approved by the same user. The flag leads to a review of the bills and CCTV, which is how the actual explanation, genuine or not, is found. The tool pointed to the place; the auditor found the facts.
AI can help keep checklists current and test them:
Treat the output as a prompt to check the law, not as the law. Tools can be out of date, and a wrong rate or section carried into a report is the auditor’s error.
NLP lets a tool read long documents and find what matters:
Illustrative example: An audit team asks a tool to list every vendor contract without a confidentiality or termination clause. The team then reads the short list in full, instead of reading hundreds of contracts to find a few.
AI is not only a tool for the auditor. Companies now use it in fraud detection, credit scoring, expense approval and customer screening, and internal audit is increasingly asked to give assurance over those systems too. This moves the role from reviewing outcomes to also reviewing the process behind them. A useful review covers:
Internal auditors do not need to build models, but they do need to work with IT, compliance and data teams and to ask for evidence on each of these points.
| Risk | What can go wrong | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong or invented output | A tool states a figure, section or clause that does not exist | Trace every flag to source documents before reporting |
| Poor data quality | Duplicate masters, missing fields and wrong mapping give false flags and miss real ones | Clean and reconcile the data first; record completeness checks |
| Confidential data | Client data sent to a public tool or stored outside India without approval | Use approved tools under a written agreement; remove personal data where possible |
| Personal data | Employee and customer data processed without a lawful basis | Follow the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and the client’s data policy |
| Bias and blind spots | Models trained on past data repeat past patterns | Also test a sample of items the tool did not flag |
| Weak documentation | Nobody can later explain what the tool did | Keep the tool name and version, settings, data period, output and reviewer in the working papers |
| Over reliance | Staff stop questioning the result | Define the reviewer’s role and sign off every automated test |
Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 13 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 requires an internal auditor for listed companies and for prescribed unlisted public and private companies, based on paid up capital, turnover, borrowings and deposits in the preceding financial year. Check the current thresholds for your company, and re-check them every year as the company grows. Even where it is not mandatory, many owners choose an internal audit for control and fraud prevention.
Our internal audit team can help you:
Please reach out to our team and we will be happy to assist.
No. AI can read, match and flag very large volumes of data, but scoping the audit, judging whether a flag is a real control failure, talking to management and giving a conclusion remain the auditor’s work. The skill that grows in value is knowing how to question the tool’s output.
No. Section 138 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 13 of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 makes it mandatory for listed companies and for prescribed unlisted public and private companies based on paid up capital, turnover, borrowings and deposits. Please check the current thresholds for your company before deciding scope.
Not by itself. A flag is a lead. The auditor should trace it to the source documents, understand the business reason and confirm the control gap before it goes into a report.
Usually not. Invoices, contracts, payroll and customer data are confidential, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 also applies to personal data. Use tools approved by the client, under a written agreement, or run them inside the client’s own environment.
Yes, often for simple things first: matching bank statements to books, finding duplicate invoices, checking expense claims against policy and testing every entry instead of a sample. These need good spreadsheets and clean data more than expensive software.
This article is cited in the reference list of "The Role of AI in Fraud Detection: Are Financial Institutions Using the Most Effective Systems?" (Hoje Jo, Hien Bui and Damon Moreland), Journal of Finance Issues, Vol. 23, No. 2 (2025). View the journal article.
This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered professional advice. Please consult a qualified expert for advice tailored to your specific situation. The author and website owner are not liable for any errors or actions based on this content.